TitleStarch gelatinisation in Couette-Taylor flow apparatus
Journal titleChemical and Process Engineering
NumerNo 4 December
Keywordsstarch gelatinisation ; Couette-Taylor flow ; computer simulation
Divisions of PASNauki Techniczne
PublisherPolish Academy of Sciences Committee of Chemical and Process Engineering
TypeArtykuły / Articles
IdentifierDOI: 10.2478/v10176-011-0021-7 ; ISSN 0208-6425
SourceChemical and Process Engineering; 2011; No 4 December; 267-279
ReferencesBaks T. (2007), Comparison of methods to determine the degree of gelatinisation for both high and low starch concentrations, Carbohydr. Polym, 67, 481, doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.016 ; Baks T. (2008), Towards an optimal process for gelatinisation and hydrolysis of highly concentrated starch-water mixtures with alpha-amylasefrom B. licheniformis, J. Cereal Sci, 47, 214, doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2007.03.011 ; E. Baruque Filho (2000), Babassu coconut starch liquefaction: an industrial scale approach to improve conversion yield, Bioresource Technol, 75, 49, doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00026-2 ; Beleia A. (2006), Modeling of starch gelatinization during cooking of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), LWT-Food Sci. Technol, 39, 400, doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.02.021 ; Birch G. (1973), Degree of Gelatinisation of Cooked Rice, Die Stark/Starch, 25, 98, doi.org/10.1002/star.19730250308 ; Brandam C. (2003), A original kinetic model for the enzymatic hydrolysis of starch during mashing, Biochem. Eng. J, 13, 43, doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00100-6 ; Coufort C. (2005), Flocculation related to local hydrodynamics in a Taylor-Couette reactor and in a jar, Chem. Eng. Sci, 60, 2179, doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.10.038 ; Dluska E. (2010), Regimes of multiple emulsions of W1/O/W2 and O1/W/O2 type in the continuous Couette-Taylor flow contactor, Chem. Eng. Technol, 33, 113, doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200900278 ; Hubacz R. (2010), Starch gelatinization and hydrolysis in the apparatus with Couette-Taylor flow, Inż. Apar. Chem, 2, 55. ; R. van den Einde (2003), Understanding molecular weight reduction of starch during heating -shearing processes, J. Food Sci, 68, 2396, doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb07036.x ; Jung W.-M. (2000), Particle morphology of calcium carbonate precipitated by gas-liquid reaction in a Couette-Taylor reactor, Chem. Eng. Sci, 55, 733, doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00395-4 ; Jung W.-M. (2010), Precipitation of calcium carbonate particles by gas-liquid reaction: morphology and size distribution of particles in Couette-Taylor and stirred tank reactors, J. Cryst. Grow, 312, 3331, doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.08.026 ; Kelder J. (2004), Power-law foods in continuous coiled steriliser, Biotechnol. Prog, 20, 921, doi.org/10.1021/bp0340436 ; Li J.-Y. (2001), Relationships between thermal, rheological characteristics and swelling power for various starch, J. Food Eng, 50, 141, doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00236-3 ; Lipatova I. (2006), Mechanical degradation of gelatinised starch upon hydroacoustic treatment, Russian J. Appl. Chem, 79, 1532, doi.org/10.1134/S1070427206090278 ; Matsuka S. (2010), Gelatinization and Enzymatic Saccharification in a Taylor-Couette flow reactor, null. ; Mitrus M. (2010), Modyfikacja skrobi ziemniaczanej metodą ekstruzji, Acta Agrophysica, 16, 1, 101. ; Nelles E. (2000), Maize Starch Biphasic Pasting Curves, J. Cereal Sci, 31, 287, doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2000.0311 ; Saomoto K. (2010), Dispersion of floating particles in a Taylor vortex flow reactor, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn, 43, 319, doi.org/10.1252/jcej.09We07 ; Sakonidou E. (2003), Mass transfer limitations during starch gelatinization, Carbohydr. Polym, 53, 53, doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00010-9 ; Wereley S. (1999), Velocity field for Taylor -Couette flow with an axial flow, Phys. Fluids, 11, 3637, doi.org/10.1063/1.870228 ; Zhu X. (2010), Study of cell seeding on porous poly(D, L-lacticco-glycolic acid) sponge and growth in a Couette-Taylor bioreactor, Chem. Eng. Sci, 65, 2108, doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.006
Dorota Antos, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland
Katarzyna Bizon, Cracow University of Technology, Poland
Tomasz Ciach, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Magdalena Cudak, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland
Grzegorz Dzido, Silesian University of Technology, Poland
Marek Dziubiński, Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Leon Gradoń, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Andrzej Górak, TU Dortmund, Germany
Andrzej Heim, Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Marek Henczka, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Andrzej Jarzębski, Silesian University of Technology, Poland
Zdzisław Jaworski, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland
Władysław Kamiński, Poland
Bożenna Kawalec-Pietrenko, Poland
Stanisław Ledakowicz, Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Łukasz Makowski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Eugeniusz Molga, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Andrzej Noworyta, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
Roman Petrus, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland
Ryszard Pohorecki, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Rafał Rakoczy, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland
Andrzej Sobkowiak, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland
Tomasz Sosnowski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
Anna Trusek, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
Kazimiera Wilk, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
Ireneusz Zbiciński, Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Publication Ethics PolicyETHICAL PRINCIPLES
Editors of the "Chemical and Process Engineering" pay attention to maintain ethical standards in scientific publications and undertake any possible measure to counteract neglecting the standards. Papers submitted for publication are evaluated with respect to reliability, conforming to ethical standards and the advancement of science. Principles given below are based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors, which may be found at:
Authorship should be limited to persons, who markedly contributed to the idea, project, realization and interpretation of results. All of them have to be listed as co-authors. Other persons, who affected some important parts of the study should be listed or mentioned as co-workers. Author should be certain that all co-authors were enlisted, saw and accepted final version of the paper and agreed upon its publication.
Disclosure and conflict of interests
Author should disclose all sources of financing of his/her study, the input of scientific institutions, associations and other subjects and all important conflicts of interests that might affect results and interpretation of the study.
Standards in reporting
Authors of papers based on original studies should present precise description of performed work and objective discussion on its importance. Source data should be accurately presented in the paper. The paper should contain detailed information and references that would enable others to use it. False or intentionally not true declarations are not ethical and are not accepted by the editors.
Access to and storage of data
Authors may be asked for providing raw data used in the paper for editorial assessment and should be prepared to store them within the reasonable time period after publication.
Multiple, unnecessary and competitive publications
As a rule author should not publish papers describing the same studies in more than one journal or primary publication. Submission of the same paper to more than one journal at the same time is not ethical and prohibited.
Confirmation of sources
Author should cite papers that affected the creation of submitted manuscript and every time he/she should confirm the use of other authors’ work.
Important errors in published papers
When author finds an important error or inaccuracy in his/her paper, he/she is obliged to inform Editorial Office about this as soon as possible.
Originality and plagiarism
Author may submit only original papers. He/she should be certain that the names of authors referred to in the paper and/or fragments of their texts are properly cited or mentioned.
Ghost writing/guest authorship are manifestation of scientific unreliability and all such cases will be revealed including notification of appropriate subjects. Signs of scientific unreliability, especially violation of ethical principles in science will be documented by the Editorial Office.
Duties of the Editorial Office
Editors know the rules of journal editing including the procedures applied in case of uncovering non-ethical practices.
Decisions on publication
Editor-in Chief is obliged to apply present legal status as to defamation, violation of author’s rights and plagiarism and bears the responsibility for decisions. He/she may consult thematic editors and/or referees in that matter.
Selection of referees
Editorial Office provides appropriate selection of referees and takes care about appropriate course of peer –reviewing (the review has to be substantive).
Every member of editorial team is not allowed to disclose information about submitted paper to any person except its author, referees, other advisors and editors.
To counteract discrimination the Editorial Office obeys the legally binding rules.
Disclosure and conflict of interests
Not published papers or their fragments cannot be used in the studies of editorial team or ref-erees without written consent of the author.
Referee supports Editor-in-Chief in taking editorial decisions and may also support author in improving the paper.
In case a selected referee is not able to review the paper or cannot do it in due time period, he/she should inform secretary of the Editorial Office about this fact.
Reviews should be objective. Personal criticism is inappropriate. Referees should clearly ex-press their opinions and support them with proper arguments.
All reviewed papers should be dealt with as confidential. They should not be discussed or revealed to persons other than the secretary of the Editorial Office.
All reviews should be made anonymously and the Editorial Office does not disclose names of the authors to referees.
Disclosure and conflict of interests
Confidential information or ideas resulting from reviewing procedure should be kept secret and should not be used to gain personal benefits. Referees should not review papers, which might generate conflict of interests resulting from relationships with the author, firm or institution involved in the study.
Confirmation of sources
Referees should indicate publications which are not referred to in the paper. Any statement that the observation, source or argument was described previously should be supported by appropriate citation. Referee should also inform the secretary of the Editorial Office about significant similarity to or partial overlapping of the reviewed paper with any other published paper and about suspected plagiarism.