Details

Title

Causal Relationship between Supply Chain Dynamic Capabilities, Technological Innovation, and Operational Performance

Journal title

Management and Production Engineering Review

Yearbook

2016

Issue

No 4

Authors

Keywords

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Divisions of PAS

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Publisher

Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management

Date

2016

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/mper-2016-0031

Source

Management and Production Engineering Review; 2016; No 4

References

Liao (2010), Relationships between knowledge acquisition absorptive capacity and innovation capability : An empirical study on Taiwan s financial and manufacturing industries, Journal of Information Science, 36, 19, doi.org/10.1177/0165551509340362 ; Li (2010), Formal control and social control in domestic and international buyer supplier relationships, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 333, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.008 ; Rosenzweig (2004), Towards a theory of competitive progression : evidence from high - tech manufacturing Production, Operations Management, 13, 354. ; Dewar (1986), The adoption of radical and incremental innovations : an empirical analysis, Management Science, 32, 1422, doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422 ; Ambrosini (2009), What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management ?, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 29, doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x ; Timilsina (2016), Which one to choose multi focus or trade - off among competitive priorities ? Evidence from Finnish SMEs Management and, Production Engineering Review, 7, 77. ; Melnyk (2004), Metrics and performance measurement in operations management : Dealing with the metrics maze, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 209, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.004 ; Flynn (2005), Synergies between supply chain management and quality management : Emerging implications, International Journal of Production Research, 43, 3421, doi.org/10.1080/00207540500118076 ; Cheung (2002), Evaluatinggoodness - of - fit indexes for testing measurement invariance Equation, Structural Modeling, 9, 233, doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 ; Prajogo (2011), The relationship between multidimensional organizational culture and performance, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 712, doi.org/10.1108/01443571111144823 ; Kristal (2010), The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 145, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002 ; Camison (2010), An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30, 853, doi.org/10.1108/01443571011068199 ; Mentzer (2001), Defining supply chain management, Journal of Business Logistics, 22, 1, doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x ; Swink (2007), Managing beyond the factory walls : Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 148, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.006 ; Wu (2006), The impact of information technology on supply chain capabilities and firm performance : A resource - based view, Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 493, doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.003 ; Kim (2010), Systems collaboration and strategic collaboration : Their impacts on supply chain responsiveness and market performance, Decision Sciences, 41, 955, doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00289.x ; Benner (2003), Exploitation exploration and process management : The productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review, 28, 238. ; Shin (2000), Supply management orientation and supplier / buyer performance, Journal of Operations Management, 18, 317, doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00031-5 ; Wong (2011), Boon - itt The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 604, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.01.003 ; Shrout (2002), Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies : new procedures and recommendations, Psychological Methods, 7, 422, doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 ; Barney (1986), Strategic factor markets : Expectations luck and business strategy, Management Science, 32, 1231, doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 ; Gupta (2006), The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693, doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026 ; Devaraj (2007), Impact of e - business technologies on operational performance : The role of production information integration in the supply chain, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1199, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.002 ; Siqueira (2008), Effects of production innovation and organizational capabilities on competitive advantage : Evidence from UK small and medium manufacturing enterprises of Innovation Management, International Journal, 12, 113. ; Damanpour (1991), Organizational innovation : a meta - analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555, doi.org/10.2307/256406 ; Sobel (1982), Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models, Sociological Methodology, 13, 290, doi.org/10.2307/270723 ; Wang (2006), A virtual integration theory of improved supply - chain performance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 41, doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230203 ; Ettlie (1984), Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation, Management Science, 30, 682, doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682 ; Prahalad (1990), The core competence of the organization May, Harvard Business Review, 79. ; Wheeler (2002), : A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net - enablement, Information Systems Research, 13, 125, doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.125.89 ; Stevenson (2007), Flexibility from a supply chain perspective : definition and review, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 685, doi.org/10.1108/01443570710756956 ; Chuang (2005), An empirical study of the construction of measuring model for organizational innovation in Taiwanese high - tech enterprises, The Journal of American Academy of Business, 9, 299. ; Frohlich (2002), E - intergration in the supply chain : barriers and performance, Decision Sciences, 33, 537, doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01655.x ; Rai (2006), Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities, MIS Quarterly, 30, 225. ; Kaynak (2008), A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain, Journal of Operations Management, 26, 468, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.002 ; Barney (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 99, doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 ; Eisenhardt (2000), Dynamic capabilities : What are they, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 10, doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E ; Narasimhan (2004), Exploring flexibility and execution competencies of manufacturing firms, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 91, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.003 ; Coyne (1997), Is your core competence a mirage ? The, Mckinsey Quarterly, 2, 40. ; Peng (2008), Linking routines to operations capabilities : A new perspective, Journal of Operations Management, 26, 730, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.001 ; Teece (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509, doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z ; Hubbard (1998), Replication in strategic management : scientific testing for validity generalizability and usefulness, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 243, doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<243::AID-SMJ951>3.0.CO;2-0 ; Flynn (2010), The impact of supply chain integration on performance : A contingency and configuration approach, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 58, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001 ; Peng (2011), Competitive priorities plant improvement and innovation capabilities and operational performance : A test of two forms fit, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 484, doi.org/10.1108/01443571111126292 ; Lee (2004), The triple - A supply chain, Harvard Business Review, 102. ; Flynn (2004), An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 439, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.03.002 ; Teece (2007), Explicating dynamic capabilities : The nature and micro - foundations of ( sustainable ) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319, doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Aims and scope

MISSION STATEMENT Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, manage- ment of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simu- lation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting- edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.
SUBMISSION Papers for submission should be prepared according to the Authors Instructions available at: www.journals.pan.pl/mper
SUBSCRIPTION Only subscription guarantees receiving this journal. Subscription orders stating the period of time, along with the subscriber’s name and address should be sent directly to the Editorial Office. Back issues of all previously published volumes are available on request. Subscription price for 2021, Volume 12, including postage and handling, is 200 PLN.

Open Access Policy

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Abstracting & Indexing

Index Copernicus
Web of Science - Clarivate (ESCI)
Scopus - Elsevier
SCIMAGO:
(CiteScore 2020 - 2.5
SJR 2020 - 0.332
SNIP 2020 - 1.061)


×