Details

Title

Optimization of geometric parameters of a ribbon impeller

Journal title

Chemical and Process Engineering

Yearbook

2017

Volume

vol. 38

Numer

No 3

Authors

Keywords

mixing ; laminar motion ; ribbon impellers ; optimization

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Techniczne

Coverage

491-502

Publisher

Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Chemical and Process Engineering

Date

2017.09.30

Type

Artykuły / Articles

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/cpe-2017-0038 ; ISSN 0208-6425

Source

Chemical and Process Engineering; 2017; vol. 38; No 3; 491-502

References

Ameur (2017), Performance of helical screw impellers for mixing of viscous liquids in cylindrical reactors Chemistry Select, null, 1891, doi.org/10.1002/slct.201602072 ; Zhang (2010), Simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentation at high corn stover solids loading in a helical stirring bioreactor, Biotechnol Bioeng, 105, doi.org/10.1002/bit.2259 ; Zhao (2013), Simultaneous saccharification and high titer lactic acid fermentation of corn stover using a newly isolated lactic acid bacteriumPediococcus acidilacticiDQ, Bioresour Technol, 135, doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.063 ; Gelus (1979), un agitateur lorsque la viscosité varie de l centipoise á Entropie, null, 88, 54. ; Kuncewicz (2010), hybrid model for flat blade impellers operating in the laminar flow, Chem Proc Eng, 31, 289. ; Takahashi (1982), Effects of geometrical variables of helical ribbon impellers on mixing of highly viscous Newtonian liquids Japan, Chem Eng, 15, 217, doi.org/10.1252/jcej.15.217 ; Obraniak (2012), Model of energy consumption in the range of nucleation and granule growth in drum granulation bentonite Problems of Mineral Processing, Physicochemical, 48, 121. ; Wang Xiao (2012), Effect of operating parameters on the mixing performance of the superblend coaxial mixer, Ind Eng Chem Research, 51, doi.org/10.1021/ie200707n ; Delaplace (2000), mixing times for helical ribbon impellers experiments, Circulation Review Exp Fluids, 28, 170, doi.org/10.1007/s003480050 ; Takahashi (null), Mixing time in an agitated vessel equipped with large impeller Japan, Chem Eng, 2015, doi.org/10.1252/jcej.14we192 ; Thiele (1972), und beim Newtonscher mit - und in laminar Bereich Dissertation Technische, null. ; Archard (2006), Anne Hydrodynamics Otto correlation in stirred vessels for yield stress fluids, Chem Eng J, 125, doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.08.002 ; Harvey (1995), Steady - state modeling and experimental measurements of a baffled impeller stirred tank, AIChE J, 2177, doi.org/10.1002/aic.690411002 ; Shiue (1984), Studies on homogenization efficiency of various agitators in liquid blending Can, J Chem Eng, 602, doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450620505 ; Ohta (1985), two - dimensional model for the secondary flow in an agitated vessel with anchor impeller Japan, Chem Eng, 18, 81, doi.org/10.1252/jcej.18.81 ; Ameur (null), efficiency of different impellers in stirred tank reactors, Energy Energy, 2015, doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.084 ; Kuncewicz (2012), cieczy wysokolepkich procesowe in Polish, null. ; He (2014), Dry dilute acid pretreatment by co - currently feeding of corn stover feedstock and dilute acid solution without impregnation, Bioresour Technol, 1, doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.074 ; Guerin (1984), Characterization of helical impellers by circulation times, Can J Chem Eng, 301, doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450620302 ; Nagata (1956), Studies on the mixing of high viscous liquids Memoirs of the Faculty of Kyoto, Engineering University, 18, 444. ; Hou (2016), evolution and CFD modeling of lignocellulose biomass during extremely high solids content pretreatment, Rheology Biochem Eng J, 105, doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.10.021 ; Carreau (1976), Mixing of viscoelastic fluids with helical - ribbon agitators Mixing time and flow patterns cjce, Can J Chem Eng, 135. ; Stręk (1981), i mieszalniki, null. ; Takahashi (1994), Mixing of highly viscous newtonian liquid in a helical ribbon agitated vessel at various liquid depths Japan, Chem Eng, 27, 244, doi.org/10.1252/jcej.27.244 ; He (2014), a Helically agitated mixing in dry dilute acid pretreatment enhances the bioconversion of corn stover into ethanol, Biotechnol Biofuels, 7, doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-1 ; Coyle (1970), Mixing in viscous liquids, AIChE J, 16, 903, doi.org/10.1002/aic.690160608 ; Ulbrecht (1985), Mixing of Liquids by Mechanical Agitation Chapter Breach New York, null. ; Delaplace (2006), An analytical model for the prediction of power consumption for shear - thinning fluids with helical ribbon and helical screw ribbon impellers, Chem Eng Sci, 3250, doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.11.069 ; Kaminoyama (1999), Numerical simulation of local heat transfer coefficient in stirred vessel with impeller for highly viscous fluids Japan, Chem Eng, 32, 23, doi.org/10.1252/jcej.32.23 ; Soliman (1985), Agitation de fluides visqueux pseudoplastiques par un double ruban helicoïdal Thesis Toulouse, null. ; Liu (2012), Simultaneous saccharification and microbial lipid fermentation of corn stover by oleaginous yeastTrichosporon cutaneum, Bioresour Technol, 13, doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.038 ; Zhang (2014), Rheological characterization and CFD modelling of corn stover water mixing system at high solids loading for dilute acid pretreatment, Biochem Eng J, 324, doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2014.06.018 ; Curran (2000), Experimental mixing of a yield stress fluid in a laminar stirred tank, Ind Eng Chem Research, 39, doi.org/10.1021/ie990468e ; Bakker (1995), Properly choose mechanical agitators for viscous liquids Progress, Chem Eng, 25. ; Wu (2012), CFD simulation of mixing for high - solids anaerobic digestion, Biotechnol Bioeng, 109, doi.org/10.1002/bit.24482 ; Robinson (2012), Flow and mixing performance in helical ribbon mixers, Chem Eng Sci, 382, doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.08.044 ; Rieger (1986), efficiency of helical ribbon agitators, Chem Eng J, 33, doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(86)80013-2 ; Kuncewicz (2013), hybrid model for ribbon impellers operating in laminar regime, Chem Eng Process Process, 73, 50, doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2013.08.003 ; Takahashi (1988), Mixing of pseudoplastic liquid in a equipped with a variety of helical ribbon impellers Japan, Chem Eng, 21, doi.org/10.1252/jcej.21.63

Editorial Board

Editorial Board

Dorota Antos, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland

Katarzyna Bizon, Cracow University of Technology, Poland

Tomasz Ciach, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Magdalena Cudak, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

Grzegorz Dzido, Silesian University of Technology, Poland

Marek Dziubiński, Lodz University of Technology, Poland

Leon Gradoń, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Andrzej Górak, TU Dortmund, Germany

Andrzej Heim, Lodz University of Technology, Poland

Marek Henczka, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Andrzej Jarzębski, Silesian University of Technology, Poland

Zdzisław Jaworski, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

Władysław Kamiński, Poland

Bożenna Kawalec-Pietrenko, Poland

Stanisław Ledakowicz, Lodz University of Technology, Poland

Łukasz Makowski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Eugeniusz Molga, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Andrzej Noworyta, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland

Roman Petrus, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland

Ryszard Pohorecki, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Rafał Rakoczy, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

Andrzej Sobkowiak, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland

Tomasz Sosnowski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Anna Trusek, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland

Kazimiera Wilk, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland

Ireneusz Zbiciński, Lodz University of Technology, Poland


Publication Ethics Policy

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

Editors of the "Chemical and Process Engineering" pay attention to maintain ethical standards in scientific publications and undertake any possible measure to counteract neglecting the standards. Papers submitted for publication are evaluated with respect to reliability, conforming to ethical standards and the advancement of science. Principles given below are based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors, which may be found at:
http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/Best_Practice.pdf

Authors’ duties

Authorship
Authorship should be limited to persons, who markedly contributed to the idea, project, realization and interpretation of results. All of them have to be listed as co-authors. Other persons, who affected some important parts of the study should be listed or mentioned as co-workers. Author should be certain that all co-authors were enlisted, saw and accepted final version of the paper and agreed upon its publication.

Disclosure and conflict of interests
Author should disclose all sources of financing of his/her study, the input of scientific institutions, associations and other subjects and all important conflicts of interests that might affect results and interpretation of the study.

Standards in reporting
Authors of papers based on original studies should present precise description of performed work and objective discussion on its importance. Source data should be accurately presented in the paper. The paper should contain detailed information and references that would enable others to use it. False or intentionally not true declarations are not ethical and are not accepted by the editors.

Access to and storage of data
Authors may be asked for providing raw data used in the paper for editorial assessment and should be prepared to store them within the reasonable time period after publication.

Multiple, unnecessary and competitive publications
As a rule author should not publish papers describing the same studies in more than one journal or primary publication. Submission of the same paper to more than one journal at the same time is not ethical and prohibited.

Confirmation of sources
Author should cite papers that affected the creation of submitted manuscript and every time he/she should confirm the use of other authors’ work.

Important errors in published papers
When author finds an important error or inaccuracy in his/her paper, he/she is obliged to inform Editorial Office about this as soon as possible.

Originality and plagiarism
Author may submit only original papers. He/she should be certain that the names of authors referred to in the paper and/or fragments of their texts are properly cited or mentioned.

Ghostwriting
Ghost writing/guest authorship are manifestation of scientific unreliability and all such cases will be revealed including notification of appropriate subjects. Signs of scientific unreliability, especially violation of ethical principles in science will be documented by the Editorial Office.


Duties of the Editorial Office


Editors’ duties
Editors know the rules of journal editing including the procedures applied in case of uncovering non-ethical practices.

Decisions on publication
Editor-in Chief is obliged to apply present legal status as to defamation, violation of author’s rights and plagiarism and bears the responsibility for decisions. He/she may consult thematic editors and/or referees in that matter.

Selection of referees
Editorial Office provides appropriate selection of referees and takes care about appropriate course of peer –reviewing (the review has to be substantive).

Confidentiality
Every member of editorial team is not allowed to disclose information about submitted paper to any person except its author, referees, other advisors and editors.

Discrimination
To counteract discrimination the Editorial Office obeys the legally binding rules.

Disclosure and conflict of interests
Not published papers or their fragments cannot be used in the studies of editorial team or ref-erees without written consent of the author.


Referees' duties

Editorial decisions

Referee supports Editor-in-Chief in taking editorial decisions and may also support author in improving the paper.

Back information
In case a selected referee is not able to review the paper or cannot do it in due time period, he/she should inform secretary of the Editorial Office about this fact.

Objectivity standards
Reviews should be objective. Personal criticism is inappropriate. Referees should clearly ex-press their opinions and support them with proper arguments.

Confidentiality
All reviewed papers should be dealt with as confidential. They should not be discussed or revealed to persons other than the secretary of the Editorial Office.

Anonymity
All reviews should be made anonymously and the Editorial Office does not disclose names of the authors to referees.

Disclosure and conflict of interests
Confidential information or ideas resulting from reviewing procedure should be kept secret and should not be used to gain personal benefits. Referees should not review papers, which might generate conflict of interests resulting from relationships with the author, firm or institution involved in the study.

Confirmation of sources
Referees should indicate publications which are not referred to in the paper. Any statement that the observation, source or argument was described previously should be supported by appropriate citation. Referee should also inform the secretary of the Editorial Office about significant similarity to or partial overlapping of the reviewed paper with any other published paper and about suspected plagiarism.

×