Perceived competence and warmth influence respect, liking and trust in work relations

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin




No 4


Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne


Committee for Psychological Science PAS




DOI: 10.1515/ppb-2016-0050


Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2016; No 4


Cuddy (2008), Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception : The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, ; Langfred (2004), Too much of a good thing ? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self - managing teams, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385, ; Willis (2006), First impressions : making up your mind after a - ms exposure to a face, Psychological Science, 17, 592, ; Dirks (2001), The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings, Organization Science, 12, 450, ; Bertolotti (2013), The Big Two in Political Communication, Social Psychology, 44, 117, ; Matzler (2006), The relationship between interpersonal trust , employee satisfaction , and employee loyalty, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17, 1261, ; Wojciszke (2009), Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes : Liking depends on communion , respect depends on agency, European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973, ; Fulmer (2012), At What Level ( and in Whom ) We Trust : Trust Across Multiple Organizational Levels, Journal of Management, 38, 1167, ; Fiske (1993), Controlling other people : The impact of power on stereotyping, American Psychologist, 48, 621, ; Whitener (1998), Managers as initiators of trust : An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior, Academy of Management Review, 23, 513, ; Davis (2000), The trusted general manager and business unit performance : empirical evidence of a competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563,<563::AIDSMJ99>3.0.CO;2-0 ; Simons (2000), Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams : The pivotal role of intragroup trust, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102, ; Gillespie (2004), Transformational leadership and shared values : the building blocks of trust, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 588, ; Bruckmüller (2013), The Density of the Big Two, Social Psychology, 44, 63, ; Abele (2008), Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion : Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence, European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202, ; Abele (2007), Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751, ; Todorov (2009), Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness After Minimal Time Exposure, Social Cognition, 27, 813, ; Cislak (2013), Effects of Power on Social Perception All Your Boss Can See is Agency, Social Psychology, 44, 138, ; Colquitt (2007), Trust , trustworthiness , and trust propensity : A meta - analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909, ; Rousseau (1998), Not so different after all : A cross - discipline view of trust, Academy of Management Review, 23, 393, ; Aryee (2002), Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes : Test of a social exchange model, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267, ; Zaheer (1998), Does Trust Matter ? Exploring the Effects Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance, Organization Science, 9, 141, ; Brambilla (2011), Looking for honesty : The primary role of morality ( vs sociability and competence ) in information gathering, European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135, ; Abele (2008), The influence of success and failure experiences on agency, European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 436, ; Edwards (2009), The value of value congruence, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 654, ; Wojciszke (2008), The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations, European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139, ; Singh (2009), Interpersonal trust and organizational citizenship behavior, Psychological Studies, 54, 65, ; Sargent (2004), Careers and academic research collaborations : An inductive process framework for understanding successful collaborations, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 308, ; Lee (2006), Tension and trust in international business negotiations : American executives negotiating with Chinese executives, Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 623, ; McAllister (1995), Affect - and cognition - based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24, ; Mayer (1995), An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709, ; Mayer (2005), Trust in management and performance : who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874, ; Rosenberg (1968), A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impression, Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 9, 283, ; Gulati (2007), Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships : Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer s Performance in Procurement Relationships, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 32, ; Olekalns (2007), Loose with the Truth : Predicting Deception in Negotiation, Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 225, ; Abele (2014), Communal and agentic content in social cognition : A dual perspective model In pp Burlington : Academic Press, Advances In Experimental Social Psychology ( Vol, 195, ; Judd (2005), Fundamental dimensions of social judgment : understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899, ; Simpson (2007), Psychological Foundations of Trust, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264, ; Fiske (2002), A model of ( often mixed ) stereotype content : competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878,

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information

• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions


• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO